软件测试成本评估方法研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2475.2011.09.057

计算机与现代化 ›› 2011, Vol. 193 ›› Issue (9): 210-214.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2475.2011.09.057

软件测试成本评估方法研究

曹静^1，2,邵宗有³

1.天津市涉密系统测评中心,天津 300204; 2.天津大学计算机科学与技术学院，天津 300072； 3.天津曙光计算机产业有限公司,天津 300382

收稿日期:2011-07-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-09-22 发布日期:2011-09-22

Research on Evaluation Method of Software Testing Cost

CAO Jing ^1,2, SHAO Zong-you³

1.Tianjin Security System Testing Center, Tianjin 300204, China; 2.School of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;3.Tianjin Dawning Computer Industry Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300382, China

Received:2011-07-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-09-22 Published:2011-09-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 测试是软件领域的一项重要技术,软件测试成本评估是软件项目成本评估的重要组成部分,一直以来软件测试成本评估比较难实现。本文涉及的软件测试成本评估主要分为3个步骤:首先评估软件规模;其次根据不同的软件规模运用不同的评估模型评估出软件生存周期总工作量,模型包括适用于小型软件的基于经验法则的评估模型，适用于中型软件的COCOMO模型,适用于大型软件的动态多变量模型；最后则是软件测试成本的评估。

关键词: 软件测试成本评估, 评估模型, 经验法则, COCOMO模型, 动态多变量模型

Abstract: Software testing is one of the most important technique in the field of software engineering. Being a hard work, evaluation of software testing cost play a vital role in software testing. This paper proposes three steps method for the evaluation: first is evaluation of software scale; next is evaluation total work-load according to different software scale and evaluation model which including experiential model for small scale software testing, COCOMO model for mediumsized software testing, dynamic multi-variable model for large scale; finally is evaluation of software testing cost.

Key words: evaluation of software testing cost, evaluation model, empirical rule, COCOMO model, dynamic multi-variable model

中图分类号:

TP311.5

曹静;邵宗有. 软件测试成本评估方法研究[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2011, 193(9): 210-214.

CAO Jing;SHAO Zong-you. Research on Evaluation Method of Software Testing Cost[J]. Computer and Modernization, 2011, 193(9): 210-214.

软件测试成本评估方法研究

Research on Evaluation Method of Software Testing Cost

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价